Opened 14 years ago
Last modified 14 years ago
#217 new enhancement
procmail's ^TO expansion does not include X-Original-To — at Initial Version
| Reported by: | geofft | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Keywords: | ||
| Cc: |
Description
Our FAQ says that you should look at the X-Original-To header. procmail has this nice TO_ header field:
If the regular expression contains ‘TO_’ it will be substituted by ‘(((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)’, which should catch all destination specifications containing a specific address.
Meanwhile, we document:
You can access the tag on a message from your procmailrc file by parsing the X-Original-To header or as the $1 variable.
Note that the regex matches Original-To but not X-Original-To.
A request to match X-Original-To too should be filed upstream with procmail, unless X-Original-To is a thing we do and not that procmail/postfix does in which case we should switch to Original-To, or unless it's a thing that postfix does in which case we should file a bug with them telling them to switch to Original-To.
